Will Guns and Therapy Stop Military Base Killings?
Printer-friendly versionPDF version
a a
 
Type Size: Small
The Fiscal Times
April 6, 2014

Providing better mental health services and arming base personnel will help prevent shootings like the one at Fort Hood last week, according to some lawmakers and former military officials. 

Rep. Michael McCaul (R-TX), chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, said that in the wake of last week’s shooting at Fort Hood in Texas, lawmakers should consider ways to allow more military personnel to carry firearms on bases. 

Related: Lifelong Pensions for Vets Could Be Whacked Under Pentagon Proposal

“They defend us overseas and defend our freedom abroad, so the idea that they are defenseless when they come on our home bases, I think, Congress should be looking at that and having a discussion with the bases about what would be the best policy,” McCaul said today on “Fox News Sunday.” 

“We should be looking at the idea of senior leadership at these bases, give them the ability to carry a weapon,” he added.

Army officials on Friday said Spec. Ivan A. Lopez’s shooting spree was sparked by an argument over leave-of-absence paperwork. Lopez shot and killed four people, including himself, and wounded 16 others in the process. 

Last week’s incident was the third fatal shooting on a U.S. military base since mid-September and the second at Fort Hood since 2009, when an Army psychiatrist killed 13 people. 

Related: Vets' Programs on the Chopping Block As DOD Cuts Back 

Lopez, who served in Iraq in 2011, was being evaluated for post-traumatic stress disorder. Former Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Admiral Michael Mullen said today that difficulties associated with PTSD might be on the rise. 

“I think we’re going to see, actually, an increased number of challenges associated with that, and we all need to wrap our arms around the force to help them deal with those,” Mullen said on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” He also said “we need to certainly take a look at securing our bases for our people.” 

Democratic lawmakers such as Sen. Tim Kaine of Virginia, where a shooting at a Navy base occurred last month, said that while security is important, so is the need for mental health services, particularly following the automatic spending cuts known as sequestration.

Related: Young Military Vets Face New Battle for Jobs 

 “When we’re requiring them to do across the board cuts, we need to look at the effects on mental health services,” Kaine, a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said on “Fox News Sunday.” 

“It’s been 13 years of war and repeated deployments,” he added. “Congress should not stress them further with things like sequester and budgetary moves that deprives them of the certainty they need.” 

Top Reads from The Fiscal Times:

A senior writer for The Fiscal Times based in Washington, D.C., Timothy Homan covers defense and national security matters. He previously worked as an economics and congressional reporter for Bloomberg News and covered international trade for Congressional Quarterly.