6.6M Homes at Risk of Hurricane Damage This Year. Here’s Which States They’re In

6.6M Homes at Risk of Hurricane Damage This Year. Here’s Which States They’re In

REUTERS
By Beth Braverman

As hurricane season gets underway, real estate analytics firm CoreLogic is warning that there are more than 6.6 million U.S. homes at risk of being hit by a storm surge. That could lead to as much at $1.5 trillion in damage.

The homes are in 19 states and the District of Columbia along the Atlantic and Gulf Coasts. Six states account for more than three-quarters of all at-risk homes, with Florida having the most (2.5 million), followed by Louisiana (760,000), New York (465,000), New Jersey (446,148), Texas (441,304) and Virginia (420,052).

Related: How Climate Change Costs Could Soar to the Billions

“The number of hurricanes each year is less important than the location of where the next hurricane will come ashore,” CoreLogic’s senior hazard risk analyst said in a statement. “It only takes one hurricane that pushes storm surge into a major metropolitan area for the damage to tally in the billions of dollars. With new home construction, and any amount of sea-level rise, the number of homes at risk of storm surge damage will continue to increase.” 

The District of Columbia has the lowest number of properties at risk (3,700), followed by New Hampshire (12,400) and Maine (22,500

State Table (Ranked by Number of Homes at Risk)

Rank

State

Extreme

Very High

High

Moderate

Low*

Total

1

Florida

793,204

461,632

524,923

352,102

377,951

2,509,812

2

Louisiana

97,760

104,059

337,495

138,762

82,196

760,272

3

New York

127,325

114,876

131,039

91,294

N/A

464,534

4

New Jersey

116,581

178,668

73,303

77,596

N/A

446,148

5

Texas

45,800

70,894

112,189

116,168

96,253

441,304

6

Virginia

94,260

115,770

98,463

84,015

27,544

420,052

7

South Carolina

107,443

57,327

65,885

46,799

30,961

308,415

8

North Carolina

73,463

51,927

48,595

40,155

37,347

251,487

9

Massachusetts

31,420

65,279

74,413

49,325

N/A

220,437

10

Maryland

47,990

39,966

27,591

28,975

N/A

144,522

11

Georgia

41,970

52,281

28,852

19,190

8,465

150,758

12

Pennsylvania

1,467

45,776

37,983

32,426

N/A

117,652

13

Mississippi

14,809

20,643

29,387

27,507

10,588

102,934

14

Connecticut

25,292

23,656

22,230

26,529

N/A

97,707

15

Alabama

7,403

12,707

10,182

13,749

14,086

58,127

16

Delaware

11,523

10,854

13,528

13,811

N/A

49,716

17

Rhode Island

6,595

5,988

6,720

7,187

N/A

26,490

18

Maine

5,159

2,753

7,368

7,211

N/A

22,491

19

New Hampshire

2,514

3,470

4,234

2,272

N/A

12,490

20

District of Columbia

N/A**

N/A**

545

3,123

N/A

3,668

Total

1,651,978

1,438,526

1,654,925

1,178,196

685,391

6,609,016


* The "Low" risk category is based on Category 5 hurricanes, which are not likely along the northeastern Atlantic coast. States in that area have N/A designated for the Low category due to the extremely low probability of a Category 5 storm affecting that area.
** Washington, D.C. has no Atlantic coastal properties, but can be affected by larger hurricanes that push storm surge into the Potomac River. Category 1 and 2 storms will likely not generate sufficient storm surge to affect properties in Washington, D.C. 

Budget ‘Chaos’ Threatens Army Reset: Retired General

By Yuval Rosenberg

One thing is standing in the way of a major ongoing effort to reset the U.S. Army, writes Carter Ham, a retired four-star general who’s now president and CEO of the Association of the U.S. Army, at Defense One. “The problem is the Washington, D.C., budget quagmire.”

The issue is more than just a matter of funding levels. “What hurts more is the erratic, unreliable and downright harmful federal budget process,” which has forced the Army to plan based on stopgap “continuing resolutions” instead of approved budgets for nine straight fiscal years. “A slowdown in combat-related training, production delays in new weapons, and a postponement of increases in Army troop levels are among the immediate impacts of operating under this ill-named continuing resolution. It’s not continuous and it certainly doesn’t display resolve.”

Pentagon Pushes for Faster F-35 Cost Cuts

Lockheed Martin
By Yuval Rosenberg

The Pentagon has taken over cost-cutting efforts for the F-35 program, which has been plagued by years of cost overruns, production delays and technical problems. The Defense Department rejected a cost-saving plan proposed by contractors including principal manufacturer Lockheed Martin as being too slow to produce substantial savings. Instead, it gave Lockheed a $60 million contract “to pursue further efficiency measures, with more oversight of how the money was spent,” The Wall Street Journal’s Doug Cameron reports. F-35 program leaders “say they want more of the cost-saving effort directed at smaller suppliers that haven’t been pressured enough.” The Pentagon plans to cut the price of the F-35A model used by the Air Force from a recent $94.6 million each to around $80 million by 2020. Overall, the price of developing the F-35 has climbed above $400 billion, with the total program cost now projected at $1.53 trillion. (Wall Street Journal, CNBC)

Quote of the Day - October 6, 2017

By The Fiscal Times Staff

Sen. Bob Corker, speaking to NPR:

Chart of the Day - October 6, 2017

By The Fiscal Times Staff

Financial performance for insurers in the individual Obamacare markets is improving, driven by higher premiums and slower growth in claims. This suggests that the market is stabilizing. (Kaiser Family Foundation)

Quote of the Day - October 5, 2017

By The Fiscal Times Staff

"The train's left the station, and if you're a budget hawk, you were left at the station." -- Rep. Mark Sanford, R-S.C.